Author Interviews / 20.08.2019
Genetic Vulnerability to Early Life Stress Contributes to Risky Drinking and Drug Use in Adolescence
MedicalResearch.com Interview with:
[caption id="attachment_50970" align="alignleft" width="108"]
Dr. Lovallo[/caption]
William R. Lovallo, Ph.D.
Reseacher, University of Oklahoma College of Medicine
MedicalResearch.com: What is the background for this study?
Response: We have been interested for some time in why some people are at high risk for alcoholism. Most work in the field of addictions is focused on persons who are already impacted by their exposure to alcohol or drugs. We wanted to know what they were like before that phase of their lives. So, in 1999 we began the Family Health Patterns Project to study healthy young adults 18-30 years of age with and without family histories of alcoholism but who were not alcoholics themselves. A family history is the best known, and perhaps strongest, risk factor for future drinking problems.
We asked ourselves are the two family-history groups different? And if so, how are they different? There was at that time little literature to build on so we decided to look at as many things as we could. We began recruiting volunteers for our family-history positive and negative groups and evaluating them with a standard psychiatric interview, personality tests, measures of depressive mood and neuroticism, and measuring physiological reactivity to stress. In doing so we also began collecting DNA and studying basic genetic variants to see if any of those might be revealing.
Dr. Lovallo[/caption]
William R. Lovallo, Ph.D.
Reseacher, University of Oklahoma College of Medicine
MedicalResearch.com: What is the background for this study?
Response: We have been interested for some time in why some people are at high risk for alcoholism. Most work in the field of addictions is focused on persons who are already impacted by their exposure to alcohol or drugs. We wanted to know what they were like before that phase of their lives. So, in 1999 we began the Family Health Patterns Project to study healthy young adults 18-30 years of age with and without family histories of alcoholism but who were not alcoholics themselves. A family history is the best known, and perhaps strongest, risk factor for future drinking problems.
We asked ourselves are the two family-history groups different? And if so, how are they different? There was at that time little literature to build on so we decided to look at as many things as we could. We began recruiting volunteers for our family-history positive and negative groups and evaluating them with a standard psychiatric interview, personality tests, measures of depressive mood and neuroticism, and measuring physiological reactivity to stress. In doing so we also began collecting DNA and studying basic genetic variants to see if any of those might be revealing.

Leighton Ku, PhD, MPH
Professor, Dept. of Health Policy and Management
Director, Center for Health Policy Research
Milken Institute School of Public Health
George Washington University
Washington, DC 20052
MedicalResearch.com: What is the background for this study?
Response: In this study, we examined how requirements that low-income adults work in order to keep their food assistance benefits (SNAP, formerly called food stamps) affects the number of people receiving benefits. Briefly, we found, based on analyses of data from 2,410 counties from 2013 to 2017, that soon after work requirements are introduced, more than a third of affected participants lose their food assistance. This meant that about 600,000 poor adults lost food assistance very quickly.
This is important for two reasons:
(1) Work requirements create greater hardship, including food insecurity and increased risk of health problems, when poor people lose their nutrition benefits.
(2) The Trump Administration is trying to broaden this policy, expanding it further in SNAP, but also applying work requirements to Medicaid (for health insurance) and public housing benefits. This is a massive effort at social experimentation that will cause tremendous harm.
And the sad part is that we already know, from other research, that these work requirement programs do not actually help people get jobs, keep them or to become more self-sufficient. This is because the work requirements do not address the real needs of low-income unemployed people, to learn how to get better job skills or to have supports, such as child care, transportation or health insurance, that let them keep working.




