Author Interviews, Heart Disease, Technology, University Texas / 11.05.2016
Poor Outcomes with FIRM-ablation Alone in Non-Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation
MedicalResearch.com Interview with:
Sanghamitra Mohanty, MD MS FHRS
Director, translational research, Texas Cardiac Arrhythmia Institute and Associate Professor (affiliate) Dell Medical School
MedicalResearch.com: What is the background for this study?
Dr. Mohanty: In patients with atrial fibrillation, Focal Impulse and Rotor Modulation (FIRM)-ablation alone or in combination with pulmonary vein (PV) isolation has been documented to possibly be a better alternative to PV isolation only. However, none of those trials had a randomized study design. The current study was the first attempt to compare 3 ablation strategies namely FIRM ablation alone (group 1), FIRM +PV isolation (group 2) and PV isolation combined with ablation of non-PV triggers (group 3) in a randomized controlled trial in persistent and long-standing persistent AF.
MedicalResearch.com: What are the main findings?
Dr. Mohanty: Our main findings were the following:
1) Procedure time was significantly shorter in group 3 (no FIRM ablation) compared to group 1 and 2 (with FIRM ablation)
2) FIRM-ablation alone had very poor outcome in terms of arrhythmia recurrence (86%)
3) FIRM ablation plus PV isolation had significantly longer procedure time and lower efficacy than PV isolation + non-PV trigger-ablation (52.4% vs 76%, p=0.02).
(more…)