MedicalResearch.com Interview with: Brett King, M.D., Ph.D. Assistant Professor of Dermatology Yale University School of Medicine Medical Research: What is the background for this...
MedicalResearch.com Interview with:
Dr. Carsten Lennerz
Deutsches Herzzentrum
München
Medical Research: What is the background for this study? What are the main findings?
Response: The number of cardiovascular implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) is increasing. Worldwide more than 4 million people rely on an implanted pacemaker (PM) or implantable cardioverter defibrillator ICD. Sensing intrinsic cardiac electrical activity is the core principle of all CIED devices, however in case of electromagnetic interference (EMI) exogenous electric and magnetic fields can be picked up by the sensing circuit and mistakenly interpreted as a cardiac signal by the CIED. PM can respond to EMI with pacing-inhibition, leading to bradycardia or asystole and resulting in syncope. In ICDs EMI may be detected as a life threatening ventricular arrhythmia with the subsequent delivery of inappropriate shocks.
Early studies on EMI, run more than 10 years ago, have identified mobile phones as a source of EMI with pacemakers. Based on these pacemaker studies the CIED manufacturer and the regulatory authorities (e.g. Food and Drug Administration [FDA]) currently recommend a safety distance, i.e. hold the phone to the contra-lateral ear and avoid placing a turned-on phone next to the generator pocket.
In the meantime telecommunication and the CIED techniques have dramatically evolved. The classic mobile phone has been replaced by modern smartphones, furthermore the network standards have changed from GSM to UMTS (3G) and LTE (4G). New cardiac devices are now in use including more devices for cardiac resynchronisation therapy (CRT) or for the protection from sudden cardiac death (ICD); some of them are even compatible for MRI diagnostics.
With the use of a hemertic titanium shell, new filtering properties of the feed-throughs, sense amplifiers and noise protection algorhythms as well as the predominant use of bipolar leads the CIED may be better shielded against external influences and adverse effects of EMI.
In light of the above, the purpose of our study was to evaluate if previous precautions recommended to cardiovascular implantable electronic devices recipients are still up-to-date or if they can be abandoned. By today there are neither studies focusing on EMI between modern smartphones and modern CIEDs nor on newer mobile network standards (UMTS or LTE).
In a cross-sectional study we enrolled 308 patients and exposed them to the electromagnetic field of three smartphones (Samsung Galaxy 3, Nokia Lumia, HTC One XL) by placing the handhelds directly over the pulse generator. Installing an own base mobile network station we ensured that each smartphone went through a standardized protocol that included the entire calling process (connecting, ringing, talking), the handovers between all current network standards (GSM, UMTS, LTE where applicable) and operation at maximal transmission power.
More than 3.400 tests on electromagnetic interference were performed. One out of 308 patients (0.3%) was repeatedly affected by EMI caused by smartphones. The patient’s MRI compatible CRT-defibrillator malfunctioned with short-term ventricular and atrial oversensing when exposed to Nokia or HTC smartphones operating at GSM and UMTS.MedicalResearch.com Interview with: Todd Morgan, Ph.D. Chief Scientific Officer L-Nutra, Inc Culver City, CA 90232 Medical Research: What is the background for this study? Dr. Longo:...
MedicalResearch.com Interview with:
Dr. Bernadette Boden-Albala MPH, DrPH
Associate Dean of Program Development
NYU’s College of Global Public Health
Medical Research: What is the background for this study? What are the main findings?
Response: Stroke is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality globally and in the US. The US Food and Drug Administration has approved tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) as treatment for acute ischemic strokes within 3 hours of the onset of stroke symptoms. However, less than 25% of eligible stroke patients arrive to an emergency department (ED) in time to receive treatment with tPA. Our study, the Stroke Warning Information and Faster Treatment (SWIFT), compares the effect of an interactive intervention (II) with enhanced educational (EE) materials on recurrent stroke arrival times.
The II group included in-hospital interactive group sessions consisting of a community placed preparedness PowerPoint presentation; a stroke survivor preparedness narrative video; and the use of role-playing techniques to describe stroke symptoms. Both groups received standardized educational materials focused on being prepared to recognize and react to stroke symptoms plus a medical alert bracelet so medical professionals would recognize them as SWIFT participants.
We found that at follow-up, 42 percent of these patients arrived to the emergency room within 3 hours compared to only 28 percent at baseline, a 49 percent increase in the proportion of all patients arriving within three hours of symptom onset. Among Hispanics, there was a 63 percent increase. While there was no difference in the proportion arriving within 3 hours between intervention groups, the intensive intervention appeared to be more beneficial in those with early recurrent events within the first 30 days.
MedicalResearch.com Interview with:
Katherine Ahrens Ph.D. MPH
National Center for Health Statistics
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Hyattsville, MD
Medical Research: What is the background for this study?
Dr. Ahrens: In 2008, the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) revised their recommended minimum daily intake of vitamin D for infants and children to 400 IU.
Medical Research: What are the main findings?
Dr. Ahrens: Approximately one quarter of US infants aged 0 to 11 months met the 2008 AAP vitamin D recommendations on a given day in 2009 to 2012. Fewer than 1 in 5 breastfed infants met the vitamin D recommendations compared to nearly 1 in 3 non-breastfed infants.
MedicalResearch.com Interview with:
Barbara W. Trautner, MD, PhD
Houston Veterans Affairs Center for Innovations in Quality, Effectiveness and Safety, Michael E. DeBakey Veterans Affairs Medical Center
Section of Infectious Diseases
Department of Medicine
Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
Medical Research: What is the background for this study? What are the main findings?
Dr. Trautner: Reducing antimicrobial overuse, or antimicrobial stewardship, is a national imperative. If we fail to optimize and limit use of these precious resources, we may lose effective antimicrobial therapy in the future. CDC estimates that more than $1 billion is spent on unnecessary antibiotics annually, and that drug-resistant pathogens cause 2 million illnesses and 23,000 deaths in the U.S. each year. The use of antibiotics to treat asymptomatic bacteriuria (ASB) is a significant contributor to antibiotic overuse in hospitalized and nursing home patients, especially among patients with urinary catheters. In catheterized patients, ASB is very often misdiagnosed and treated as catheter-associated urinary tract infection (CAUTI). Therefore, we designed the “Kicking CAUTI: The No Knee-Jerk Antibiotics Campaign intervention” to reduce overtreatment of ASB and to reduce the confusion about distinguishing CAUTI from asymptomatic bacteriuria.
This study evaluated the effectiveness of the Kicking CAUTI intervention in two VAMCs between July 2010 and June 2013. The primary outcomes were urine cultures ordered per 1,000 bed-days (inappropriate screening for ASB) and cases of ASB receiving antibiotics (overtreatment). The study included 289,754 total bed days, with 170,345 at the intervention site and 119,409 at the comparison site. Through this campaign, researchers were able to dramatically decrease the number of urine cultures ordered. At the intervention site, the total number of urine cultures ordered decreased by 71 percent over the course of the intervention. Antibiotic treatment of asymptomatic bacteriuria decreased by more than 75 percent during the study. No significant changes occurred at the comparison site over the same time period. Failure to treat catheter-associated urinary tract infection when indicated did not increase at either site.
MedicalResearch.com Interview with:
Dr. Mia T. Minen, MD, MPH
Director, Headache Services
NYU Langone Medical Center
Assistant professor, Department of Neurology
Medical Research: What is the background for this study? What are the main findings?
Dr. Minen: We conducted a survey on opioid and barbiturate use among patients visiting a headache center to find out which medications they were receiving for treatment. There’s limited evidence that long-term use of these medications can help treat headaches or migraines, and even short-term use in small quantities can cause medication overuse headache. It is important to determine which providers start these medications so that educational interventions can be tailored to these physician specialties to try to prevent situations such as incorrect prescribing practices and medication overuse.
In this sample of patients from a specialty headache center, approximately 20 percent of patients -- or 1 in 5 -- were using opioids or barbiturates, and about half had been prescribed these medications at some point in the past for their headaches. These findings show that opioids and barbiturates are commonly prescribed to patients with headaches. While two-thirds of patients found opioids or barbiturates helpful, many did not like them, were limited by side effects or did not find them to be helpful. Emergency department physicians were reported to be the most frequent first prescribers of opioids and general neurologists were the most frequent prescribers of barbiturate-containing medications. Primary care physicians were also identified as frequent first prescribers of these medications.
MedicalResearch.com Interview with:
Mitchell S. Stark
Senior Research Assistant/PhD Student
Oncogenomics Group
QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute
Herston, Brisbane, Australia
Medical Research: What is the background for this study?
What are the main findings?
Response: Melanomas are among the most commonly occurring cancers with the number of new cases rising each year. Melanoma is currently is listed as the 4th and 6th most common cancer in Australia and the USA with >11,000 and >76,000 news diagnoses each year. The overall 5-year survival for melanoma is 91%, which is largely due to curative surgery for early stage disease. However, cure rates are <15% if distant metastasis occurs (stage IV). We now have evidence that current therapeutic options for late stage disease are more effective if the disease is treated with a lower disease burden. 2010). Hence, melanoma must be treated in earlier stages to maximize the chances of patient survival. Therefore, the ability to identify signs of melanoma progression sooner would be a valuable clinical tool.
The use of melanoma progression markers have been used for many years however it is clear from the survival rates that melanoma must be detected before disease progresses thus highlighting that the current methods of progression detection are inadequate. We have identified a seven-microRNA panel (MELmiR-7) that has the ability to detect the presence of melanoma with high sensitivity and specificity which is superior to currently used markers for melanoma progression, recurrence, and survival. This panel may enable more precise measurement of disease progression and may herald an increase in overall survival.
MedicalResearch.com Interview with:
Ryan Vandrey, Ph.D.
Associate Professor
Behavioral Pharmacology Research Unit
Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine
Baltimore, MD 21224
Medical Research: What is the background for this study? What are the main findings?
Dr. Vandrey: The background for the study was that I have had several conversations with individuals that led me to believe that there was insufficient regulation of products of all types being sold in medical cannabis dispensaries. In order to evaluate that, we needed to do a study. We decided to test edible products because that is a growing market, and, because it involves some level of manufacturing, there is greater chance for dose variability and inaccuracy. The main finding was that the majority of products were purchased from retail stores selling cannabis products for medical use were significantly mislabeled with regards to the dose of THC and other cannabinoids.
MedicalResearch.com Interview with:
Vanita Ahuja, MD, MPH
Department of General Surgery
York Hospital, York, Pennsylvania
MedicalResearch: What is the background for this study? What are the main findings?
Dr. Ahuja: Robotic-assisted surgery has been slowly accepted within the medical community. Felger et al. (1999), Falk et al. (2000), and Loumet et al. (2000) state that specific to cardiac surgery, the advantages of the robot in coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) and valvular operations were demonstrated with increased visualization, ease of harvest, and quality of vascular anastomoses as early as 1999. However, Giulianotti, et al. (2003), Morgan et al. (2005), and Barbash et al. (2010) suggest that although safety and efficacy are supported, it is not conclusive yet that robot-assisted surgery is cost-effective, given the high cost of the robot itself, longer operating times, and the short life of the robotic instruments. The purpose of our paper was to compare outcomes of complications, length of stay (LOS), actual cost, and mortality between non-robotic and robotic-assisted cardiac surgery.
In general surgery and subspecialties, the use of the robot has increased significantly over the past few years. It has been noted that robotic surgery improves on laparoscopic surgery by providing increased intra-cavity articulation, increased degrees of freedom, and downscaling of motion amplitude that may reduce the strain on the surgeon.
The biggest growth in robotic surgery has been seen in the fields of gynecology and urology. Recently, Wright et al. reported an increase in robotic assisted hysterectomy from 0.5 percent of the procedures in 2007 compared to 9.5 percent in 2010 for benign disease. In their study, robotic assisted surgery had similar outcomes to laparoscopic surgery but higher total cost of $2,189 more per case. In urologic surgery, Leddy et al. reported in 2010 that radical prostatectomy remains the biggest utilization of robotic assisted surgery in urology with 1% in 2001 to 40% of all cases in 2006 performed in the United States.
Utilizing a nationwide database from 2008-2011, subjects were propensity matched by 14 patient characteristics to reduce selection bias in a retrospective study. The patients were then divided into three groups by operation types: valves, vessels and other type. Univariate analysis revealed that robotic-assisted surgery, compared to non-robotic surgery, had higher cost ($39,030 vs. $36,340), but lower LOS (5 vs. 6 days) and mortality (1% vs. 1.9%, all p<0.001). For those who had one or more complications, robotic-assisted cardiac surgery had fewer complications (27.2%) to non-robotic cardiac surgery (30.3%, p < .001).
MedicalResearch.com Interview with:
Laila Cure, Ph.D.
Assistant Professor
Dept. of Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering
Wichita State University
Medical Research: What is the background for this study? What are the main findings?
Response: It is widely known that healthcare work, particularly inpatient care work, is mostly knowledge-based. Healthcare workers are constantly assessing the clinical state of their patients and making decisions that affect their workflow. This type of work is difficult to study and organize as a whole using traditional work design techniques, which are mostly designed for routine, repetitive work. Nevertheless, there are components of inpatient work that can be improved using basic workstation design principles. Hand hygiene is one of them.
Hand hygiene is still the single most important intervention to prevent infection in hospitals. Guidelines state that health care workers should clean their hands before touching a patient, before an aseptic procedure, after body fluid exposure, after touching a patient, after touching patient surroundings. Hand sanitizer dispensers are practical resources to support hand hygiene because they can be placed almost anywhere throughout hospital units. This study aimed at determining whether “good” placement of sanitizer dispensers correlates with compliance of staff in using the sanitizer. “Good placement” was defined in terms of usability characteristics extracted from hand hygiene literature recommendations. Of the usability characteristics included in the study, visibility and accessibility had some statistical influence on improving compliance.
MedicalResearch.com Interview with:
Dr. Ayalew Tefferi, M.D.
Department of Medicine,
Mayo Clinic
Rochester, Minnesota
MedicalResearch: What is the background for this study? What are the main findings?
Dr. Tefferi: William Vainchenker discovered and reported an activating JAK2 mutation (JAK2V617F) in myelofibrosis and related myeloproliferative neoplasms in 2005 (Nature. 2005;434:1144-1148). This seminal observation led to the recognition of activated JAK-STAT as the potential disease-driving pathway in myeloproliferative neoplasms and development of several JAK inhibitors, including fedratinib, ruxolitinib and momelotinib, for treatment of myelofibrosis. In phase 2 studies, these JAK inhibitors showed similar activity in alleviating constitutional symptoms and reducing spleen size. However, none of them were able to induce complete or partial remissions or reversal of bone marrow fibrosis or significant lowering of JAK2 mutant allele burden. A subsequent phase 3 study provided the information required for FDA approval of ruxolitinib and the current phase 3 study was meant to do the same for fedratinib.
MedicalResearch.com Interview with:
Carlos J. Rodriguez, MD, MPH
Division of Public Health Sciences
Department of Medicine Wake Forest School of Medicine
Winston‐Salem, NC 27152
MedicalResearch: What prompted you to study cholesterol in the Latino population? Please explain in detail.
Dr. Rodriguez: Early in my career I noted that there were race-ethnic differences in the cholesterol profile between hispanics, african americans and non-hispanic whites. Hispanics are the largest ethnic minority group in the us yet prior studies of cholesterol in hispanics were relatively small, lacked adequate representation of diverse hispanic background groups for comparisons, and were not necessarily representative of nor generalizable to the hispanic population. The hispanic/latino adults in the hispanic community health study / study of latinos helped filled this critical gap.
MedicalResearch: What do you think are the most significant findings from your study? What could have the greatest clinical implications and applications?
Dr. Rodriguez: Several findings are important: less than half of those with high cholesterol were aware of their condition; less than a third of those with high cholesterol were being treated; and among those receiving treatment, only two-thirds had cholesterol concentrations that were adequately controlled.
MedicalResearch.com Interview with:
Dr. Stacy Loeb, MD, MSc
Department of Urology, Population Health,
and Laura and Isaac Perlmutter Cancer Center
New York University, New York
Medical Research: What is the background for this study?
Dr. Loeb: A paper published last year suggested a relationship between use of (Viagra) and melanoma. That study had only 142 cases of melanoma, and of these men 14 had used sildenafil. This study got a lot of publicity leading numerous patients to express concern over whether erectile dysfunction drugs could cause melanoma.
Our goal was to look more closely at this issue in a larger population from Sweden (including 4065 melanoma cases of whom 435 used any type of erectile dysfunction drug- Viagra, as well as Levitra and Cialis). Sweden has a national health system so we were able to access prescription records for men across the entire country, which we linked to the national registries for melanoma and basal cell skin cancer.
MedicalResearch.com Interview with:
Sean D. Pokorney, MD, MBA
Division of Cardiology, Duke University Medical Center
Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, North Carolina
Medical Research: What is the background for this study?
Dr. Pokorney: About 350,000 people die of sudden cardiac death in the US each year. Patients who have weakened heart function, particularly those with heart muscle damage as a result of a heart attack, are more likely to experience sudden cardiac death. Defibrillators have been around since the 1980s, and have prolonged countless lives. A previous study showed that 87% of patients who had a cardiac arrest were eligible for an implantable-cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) beforehand but did not get an ICD implanted prior to their arrest. The timing of ICD implantation is critical, as studies have not found a benefit to ICD implantation early after myocardial infarction (MI). Guidelines recommend primary prevention ICD implantation in patients with an EF ≤ 35% despite being treated with optimal medical therapy for at least 40 days after an MI. Given the need to wait for at least 40 days after an MI, ICD consideration is susceptible to errors of omission during the transition of post-MI care between inpatient and outpatient care teams. Also, the benefit of ICDs remains controversial among older patients, as these patients were underrepresented in clinical trials.
Medical Research: What are the main findings?
Dr. Pokorney: We looked at Medicare patients discharged from US hospitals after a heart attack between 2007 and 2010. We focused on those patients who had weak heart function, and this left us with a little over 10,300 patients from 441 hospitals for our study. This was an older patient population with a median age of 78 years. We looked to see how many of these patients got an ICD within the first year after MI, and how many patients survived to 2 years after their heart attack. Only 8% of patients received an ICD within 1 year of their heart attack. ICD implantation was associated with a third lower risk of death within 2 years after a heart attack, and this was consistent with the benefit that were seen in the randomized clinical trials. Importantly, 44% of the patients in our study were over 80 years old, and we found that the relationship between ICD use and mortality was the same for patients over and under age 80 years. Increased patient contact with the health care system through early cardiology follow-up or re-hospitalization for heart failure or MI was associated with higher likelihood of ICD implantation. Rates of ICD implantation remained around 1 in 10 patients within 1 year of MI even among patients with the largest heart attacks and the weakest hearts (lowest ejection fractions), who were least likely to have improvement in their heart function over time. Similarly, even after excluding patients at highest risk for non-arrhythmic death (prior cancer, prior stroke, and end stage renal disease), ICD implantation rates remained around 1 in 10 patients.
MedicalResearch.com Interview with:
Dr. Andrea Tricco Ph.D
Dalla Lana School of Public Health
University of Toronto
Medical Research: What is the background for this study? What are the main findings?
Dr. Tricco: We were commissioned by Health Canada to assess the safety and effectiveness of serotonin (5-HT3) receptor antagonists in patients undergoing surgery. In order to examine this research question, we conducted a systematic review and network meta-analysis including >450 studies.
We found that more patients receiving granisetron plus dexamethasone experienced arrhythmia compared to all other interventions and placebo. No differences were observed regarding mortality and QT prolongation in meta‐analysis; no studies reported on PR prolongation or sudden cardiac death. Granisetron plus dexamethasone was often the most effective antiemetic, with the number needed to treat ranging from two to nine. We found that ondansetron plus droperidol intravenous (IV) was also a highly effective antiemetic for decreasing the risk of vomiting and post-operative nausea and vomiting (PONV). MedicalResearch.com Interview with: Keiran Smalley, PhD. Scientific Director The Comprehensive Melanoma Research Center Associate Professor The Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa, FL Medical Research: What...
Prof. Bisgaard[/caption]
MedicalResearch.com Interview with:
Professor of Pediatrics Hans Bisgaard, MD, DMSc
Copenhagen Prospective Studies on Asthma in Childhood
Herlev and Gentofte Hospital,
University of Copenhagen, Denmark
Medical Research: What is the background for this study?
Prof. Bisgaard: Programming of the immune response in perinatal life seems to contribute to the increased prevalence of immune-mediated diseases
We hypothesized that initiation of labor could affect the developing newborn immune system.
Medical Research: What are the main findings?
Prof. Bisgaard: Pre-labor cesarean section is associated with a distinct and gestational age-related distribution of circulating immune cells in newborns suggesting that changes in specific immune compartments occur during the approach of labor.
MedicalResearch.com Interview with:
Dan Dongeun Huh, Ph.D.
Wilf Family Term Chair & Assistant Professor
Department of Bioengineering
University of Pennsylvania
Philadelphia, PA 19104
Medical Research: What is the background for this study? What are the main findings?
Response: The placenta is a temporary organ central to pregnancy and serves as a major interface that tightly regulates transport of various endogenous and exogenous materials between mother and fetus. The placental barrier consisting of the closely apposed trophoblast epithelium and fetal capillary endothelium is responsible for maintaining this critical physiological function, and its dysfunction leads to adverse pregnancy outcomes. Despite its importance, barrier function of the placenta has been extremely challenging to study due to a lack of surrogate models that faithfully recapitulate the key features of the placental barrier in humans. Our study aims to directly address this long-standing technical challenge by providing a microengineered in vitro system that replicates architecture, microenvironment, and physiological function of the human placenta barrier. This “placenta-on-a-chip” device consists of microfabricated upper and lower cell culture chambers separated by a thin semipermeable membrane, and the placental barrier is generated by culturing human trophoblasts and fetal endothelial cells on either side of the membrane with steady flows of culture media in both chambers. This microfluidic cell culture condition allowed the cells to form confluent monolayers on the membrane surface and to create a bi-layer tissue that resembled the placental barrier in vivo. Moreover, the microengineered barrier enabled transport of glucose from the maternal chamber to the fetal compartment at physiological rates.
MedicalResearch.com Interview with:
Satoru Kishi, MD
Division of Cardiology
Johns Hopkins University
Baltimore, Maryland
MedicalResearch: What is the background for this study? What are the main findings?
Dr. Kishi: Blood pressure (BP) at the higher end of the population distribution may represent a chronic exposure that produces chronic injury to the cardiovascular system. Cumulative BP exposure from young adulthood to middle age may adversely influence myocardial function and predispose individuals to heart failure (HF) and other cardiovascular disease (CVD) later in life. The 2005 guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of HF from the American College of Cardiology and American Heart Association highlight the importance of early recognition of subclinical cardiac disease and the importance of non-invasive tests in the clinical evaluation of heart failure.
Our main objective was to investigate how cumulative exposure to high blood pressure from young to middle adulthood influence LV function. In the Coronary Artery Risk Development in Young Adults (CARDIA) study, multiple repeated measures of BP and other cardiovascular risk factors was recorded over a 25 year time span, starting during early adulthood (ages 18-30).MedicalResearch.com Interview with: Dr. Yang Lin on behalf of all authors Department of Surgery, Division of Public Health Sciences Siteman Cancer Center, Washington...
MedicalResearch.com Interview with:
Kathy Magnusson D.V.M., Ph.D Professor
Oregon State College of Veterinary Medicine
Principal Investigator with the Linus Pauling Institute
Medical Research: What is the background for this study?
Dr. Magnusson: There is increasing evidence that the gut microbiome can communicate with our brain. Others had also shown that high-energy diets could alter the composition of the gut microbiome (i.e., shift the percentages of different bacteria within the population) and could alter cognitive function. We decided to use that dietary model to determine whether there was a relationship between the bacterial changes and the behavioral changes.
Medical Research: What are the main findings?
Dr. Magnusson: We found decreases in Bacteroidales and increases in Clostridiales orders of bacteria, similar to that seen in obese humans and animals on high energy diets. We also found problems with early learning for long-term memory, with delayed short-term memory and with cognitive flexibility, the ability to adapt to new rules and changing conditions. The alterations in Bacteroidales and Clostridiales showed a relationship to this decline in cognitive flexibility.